Chap­ter 21: Is Evo­lu­tion a Reli­gion? — Answers in Gen­e­sis.

Very good arti­cle that explains the dif­fer­ence between sci­ence, evo­lu­tion, and faith. Go to Answers in Gen­e­sis and read it. It helps orga­nize the ratio­nal thought on the sub­ject and make it understood.

You see, cre­ation­ists do, indeed, believe in real “obser­va­tional sci­ence,” some­times called “oper­a­tional sci­ence.” We enjoy the ben­e­fits of obser­va­tional sci­ence every day. Whether fly­ing in an air­plane, hav­ing our ill­ness cured by the won­ders of mod­ern med­i­cine, or writ­ing this book on a space-age lap­top com­puter, we are ben­e­fit­ing from the tech­nol­ogy that applies gen­uine obser­va­tional sci­ence to real-world needs. These tri­umphs of sci­ence exist in the present and can there­fore be the sub­jects of exam­i­na­tion and investigation.

Another type of sci­ence is known as “his­tor­i­cal sci­ence,” some­times called “ori­gins sci­ence.” His­tor­i­cal sci­ence is the process of using the meth­ods of sci­ence in the present to deter­mine what hap­pened in the past. Since the phys­i­cal world exists in the present, all the evi­dence a sci­en­tist has avail­able to exam­ine the phys­i­cal world also exists in the present. The sci­en­tist has no method to exam­ine directly the past; thus, he must make assump­tions in order to come to con­clu­sions. How­ever, assump­tions are unproven, and gen­er­ally unprov­able, beliefs. Assump­tions are no more than untestable guesses.

Things that hap­pened in the past are just that, past. They can­not be observed or tested in the present. They can­not be repeated or ver­i­fied in the present. Then, you ask, how do we know so much about the past?

(Via Answers in Gen­e­sis.)

Enhanced by Zemanta

This con­tent is pub­lished under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Pop­u­lar­ity: 6% [?]

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you sub­scribe to my RSS feed!
Copy the code below to your web site.
x